Enter user name and password:


VitiSynth Full Entry

Reference: Grapevine stem water potential estimation based on sensor fusion
Key Statements


Estimating vine water status is essential for achieving the desired balance between wine grape quality and yield in viticulture management and irrigation planning. The growing demands of smart farming for extracting meaningful information from field data to support irrigation decisions may be facilitated using field monitoring technology along with advanced modeling algorithms. This research took place in a Vitis Vinifera cv. “Sauvignon Blanc” experimental plot within a commercial vineyard. The main objective was to generate a water stress estimation model for wine grapevines based on data fusion from multiple sensors. Data were collected using sensors from five monitored grapevines, each treated with a different water stress regime. The sensors provided measurements of trunk and fruit growth, leaf temperature, and soil water content (SWC) at depths of 20 and 40 cm. Additionally, meteorological station in the vineyard recorded the temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation. A daily-scale multivariate time series was composed using the data derived from the sensors. Stem water potential (SWP) values were measured for the monitored vines and analyzed against the multivariate time series of factors to define their interrelations and interactions. Finally, a prediction model for SWP estimation was defined using boosted regression trees (BRT) algorithm, with an optimized set of factors. Validation was conducted using comparative statistics between a randomly selected test set and a predicted set of SWP values achieved using the trained BRT model. After processing the data and eliminating most of the factors due to multicollinearity, the model was composed of daily maximum leaf temperature (LT), SWC at noon at 40 cm, tree water deficit (TWD), SWC daily amplitude at 20 cm, water input, vapor pressure deficit, and phenological stages. The highest contributor to the BRT model was maximum LT (44.5%), followed by SWC at noon at 40 cm (16.9%) and TWD (16%). The model performance was estimated using various measures and resulted in a correlation of 0.9 between the estimated SWP values and the test set. No significant differences were found between their means (t = -0.31, p-value = 0.76) and distributions (D = 0.13, p-value = 0.77). The RMSE was 0.16 MPa which corresponds to a 12% error when normalized to the range of the test set. The suggested sensor fusion approach for estimating SWP is a promising technique that integrates representative factors of the soil–water-plant-atmosphere continuum; it should be further examined in different climate regimes and vine varieties.

Link to paper-



Partially indexed reference.

View Interactions

VitiSynth Review
Go Back


Publication Details

Published: 2022
Publication: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Issue: 2022 198-107016
Author: Ohana Levi N 2022


Related Video

None for this Entry

Related Audio

None for this Entry

Discuss this Entry

No related discussions available.

Join Discussion

Latest Discussions
Special Report

Date: 19th April 2020
Vine Synth:Growth stage:VS 4 Flowering:VS 4c Bud development:VS 4c.2 Differentiation of main axis of anlage into inflorescence rachis primordium or tendril primordium

The development of inflorescence primordia (IP) is clearly described i...Read more

Date: 16th February 2020
Admin Synth:Guides:Data standards:Colour codes

I think it would be very useful if we have standard colour codes for e...Read more

Date: 29th October 2015
Reference:Journal:Weed Technology:2015:Online October 2015:Devkota P 2015:Influence of Spray Solution Temperature and Holding Duration on Weed Control with Premixed Glyphosate and Dicamba Formulation

Pesticides in general are chemical products, therefore the quality of ...Read more

List of sponsors.. Read more